Schrijver
| GFX9000 GUI and webbrowser?
|
sjoerd msx addict Berichten: 444 | Geplaatst: 12 November 2003, 19:13   |
Quote:
| The Meridian interface is more structured than you think, it's suitable for many, many, many purposes.
|
How do you know what I think?
However, would it be possible to implement a X-Windows server on MSX with uzix? It would be funny to use a MSX as X-Terminal. |
|
GuyveR800 msx guru Berichten: 3048 | Geplaatst: 12 November 2003, 19:27   |
AFAIK X needs pretty high bandwidth, so that may be bottleneck...
|
|
sjoerd msx addict Berichten: 444 | Geplaatst: 12 November 2003, 19:46   |
Wasn't there a low bandwidth version named LBX, meant for use over modem-connections? Haven't heard of it much, but I don't follow the unix news that close. With the sunrise ethernet card it should be possible anyway, using the ez80 as co-processor.
|
|
msd msx professional Berichten: 608 | Geplaatst: 12 November 2003, 22:12   |
>Why wasn't WiOSgood enough?
For a few reasons:
Fixed resolution (only 512*212 * 16bit colors)
It's to slow and most msx coders don't code in C
|
|
karloch
 msx addict Berichten: 399 | Geplaatst: 12 November 2003, 22:32   |
I personally think that C is cool and powerful language, and of course, easier to learn than ASM. But I heard that MSX has a great lack of C compilers and libraries. Could someone tell me the best C compiler for MSX? (I supose that it is Hitech-C) And the libraries?
|
|
sjoerd msx addict Berichten: 444 | Geplaatst: 13 November 2003, 13:53   |
Maybe ASCII C. Dunno. I never used a C compiler on msx. WiOS forces you to use the ASCII version AFAIK.
|
|
Ivan
 msx professional Berichten: 878 | Geplaatst: 13 November 2003, 18:41   |
Was not Hitech C the best?
|
|
manuel msx guru Berichten: 3381 | Geplaatst: 13 November 2003, 20:06   |
Quote:
| I personally think that C is cool and powerful language, and of course, easier to learn than ASM. But I heard that MSX has a great lack of C compilers and libraries. Could someone tell me the best C compiler for MSX? (I supose that it is Hitech-C) And the libraries?
|
I'm using Hi-Tech C compiler. I very much prefer to program in C on MSX  But I'd like a good GFX9000 lib
Together with Eric Boon we use the CP/M Hi-Tech C compiler, in combination with gcc, make, wrdsk and openMSX to develop some software for MSX on a Linux system. Works pretty good! |
|
GuyveR800 msx guru Berichten: 3048 | Geplaatst: 13 November 2003, 21:12   |
IIRC, ASCII-C is more like K&R C.
void main(void)
int i;
{
/* function */
}
like that, in stead of
void main() {
int i;
/* function */
}
|
|
karloch
 msx addict Berichten: 399 | Geplaatst: 13 November 2003, 23:05   |
Quote:
| I'm using Hi-Tech C compiler. I very much prefer to program in C on MSX  But I'd like a good GFX9000 lib
Together with Eric Boon we use the CP/M Hi-Tech C compiler, in combination with gcc, make, wrdsk and openMSX to develop some software for MSX on a Linux system. Works pretty good!
|
Nice, but what about the libs? (standard libs, vdp, sound, etc...) |
|
sjoerd msx addict Berichten: 444 | Geplaatst: 13 November 2003, 23:51   |
Does anybody know of a real C (cross?) compiler on/for Z80? Or even a C++ compiler?
|
|
GuyveR800 msx guru Berichten: 3048 | Geplaatst: 14 November 2003, 00:15   |
|
|
k0ga msx user Berichten: 52 | Geplaatst: 14 November 2003, 10:16   |
|
|
sjoerd msx addict Berichten: 444 | Geplaatst: 14 November 2003, 10:49   |
Thanks 8)
|
|
Vincent van Dam msx addict Berichten: 372 | Geplaatst: 14 November 2003, 11:41   |
Quote:
| IIRC, ASCII-C is more like K&R C.
|
Yes it is, however your example is a bit confusing, I think this is more clear:
void main(int argc,char* argv[])
{
int local1;
int local2;
/* let's do it */
}
would be written as:
void main(argc,argv)
int argc;
char* argv[];
{
int local1;
int local2;
/* let's do it */
}
|
|
|
|
|