Posting Relearning MSX updates here?

Page 1/3
| 2 | 3

By Unregistered user

Ambassador (0)

Unregistered user's picture

13-11-2015, 09:24

Hi all,

Many of you already know about this, but for the ones who don't:

I'm writing a series of tutorials on how to develop for MSX using ASCII's MSX-C compiler: Relearning MSX. Today I just published chapter #34.

You don't need to have previous experience with MSX computers nor with the C programming language to follow the course. The purpose is to help users new to the MSX platform now that retro platforms are popular. Currently we're still looking at the MSX-C language and after a few more posts we'll start diving into graphics modes, sprites, sound, etc.

After writing every new chapter I post it to Twitter and Facebook, and I'm wondering whether you'd like me to post the updates here as well.

Regards,

Login or register to post comments

By iamweasel2

Paladin (713)

iamweasel2's picture

14-11-2015, 01:52

Yes, please post the updates here. Smile

By snout

Ascended (15187)

snout's picture

14-11-2015, 18:01

Actually, news submits would be highly appreciated :)

By anonymous

incognito ergo sum (116)

anonymous's picture

15-11-2015, 04:54

snout wrote:

Actually, news submits would be highly appreciated :)

I don't mind submitting it as news, but don't you think people would get tired of it if every week they saw a new Relearning MSX post in the front page?

By Grauw

Ascended (10767)

Grauw's picture

15-11-2015, 07:51

Yeah, I think you’re right about that Smile. You could do an introductionary news post now though… certainly deserves one!

By ren

Paragon (1934)

ren's picture

15-11-2015, 12:14

Yeah, perhaps a single (spotlighted) news post, a (non-posting) thread to do further announcements + a thread to discuss? Smile

Pretty cool series btw.. Wink

(OTOH, making a fresh thread for every new lesson/edition keeps announcement (/ the topic) + discussion nicely together..)

By anonymous

incognito ergo sum (116)

anonymous's picture

20-11-2015, 03:41

ren wrote:

Pretty cool series btw.. Wink

Thanks! I'm glad you're enjoying the boring part! After we finish learning MSX-C we'll start the fun stuff (graphics, sprites, sound, etc).

That's if I don't get ran over by a bus, or get tired of it at some point. ;-)

By Metalion

Paragon (1625)

Metalion's picture

20-11-2015, 09:09

JavilM, I appreciate your efforts towards the MSX community, but I was quite baffled to see that on your website, you expect (at least some) people to PAY for those MSX lessons. Granted, they become free after a week or so, but nonetheless, it suddenly gives a very different feeling to your contributions ...

By anonymous

incognito ergo sum (116)

anonymous's picture

20-11-2015, 09:54

Metalion wrote:

JavilM, I appreciate your efforts towards the MSX community, but I was quite baffled to see that on your website, you expect (at least some) people to PAY for those MSX lessons. Granted, they become free after a week or so, but nonetheless, it suddenly gives a very different feeling to your contributions ...

Donating is completely voluntary. And as you correctly pointed out, everybody gets access to the content a week after it's posted, whether they donated or not.

Probably we're looking at it from different angles. Can you please explain why accepting donations is a problem?

By o.geerdink

Hero (588)

o.geerdink's picture

20-11-2015, 10:34

I like that business model. Unfortunately I don't use C on MSX. I have used it on linux and Windows but for MSX it feels like waisting precious memory and processing power.

By anonymous

incognito ergo sum (116)

anonymous's picture

26-11-2015, 12:16

o.geerdink wrote:

Unfortunately I don't use C on MSX. I have used it on linux and Windows but for MSX it feels like waisting precious memory and processing power.

It depends on what you are developing. Case in point: InterNestor is 100% assembler because it is a resident program and it needs to be as fast as possible. But I wrote most of my networking applications in C because really the bottleneck is the network, and most importantly, they are complex enough that it would take me forever to develop them in assembler (take a look at the source of ObsoSMB, for example!)

Page 1/3
| 2 | 3