How MSX pseudo-stereo works?

Página 1/3
| 2 | 3

Por Eugeny_Brychkov

Paragon (1232)

imagem de Eugeny_Brychkov

04-06-2017, 00:09

I had experience with Unknown Reality 1 only, to my understanding it plays MSX-MUSIC through one channel, and MSX-AUDIO through another one. Am I correct? Where is the PSG in this equation, does it join one of the channels? If yes, then how it joins this channel if it is available only as an "echo" from the slot connector pin 49?

I also know it is somehow realized in OCM. Is it the same? What are issues you found with this architecture?

Entrar ou registrar-se para comentar

Por meits

Scribe (6571)

imagem de meits

04-06-2017, 03:51

The music of Unknown Reality is made in Moonblaster 1.4. That goes for the FM music, the samples are done in Sampbox.
Moonblaster supports MSX-Audio and MSX-Music at the same time. The developer expects that the musician and the listener has an output on each of the cartridges and each connected to a different speaker (EG, Audio left and Music right).
MSX-Music can play 6 FM plus 5 drum channels or 9 FM channels. Moonblaster can switch between both modes. To reach out to the musician, Moonsoft has added PSG drums to fill up the gap.
This PSG drum hasn't been used that much as they sound like dry farts, though Compjoetania did use them for Unknown Reality. My guess is to have some drum in the least favorite setup possible: MSX-Music only and monitor only. That way both chips are combined and there's some kind of rhythm.
If the desired setup is available, the ADPCM drums will play on the MSX-Audio speaker and the MSX-Music speaker will have no rhythm (unless you own an FM-Stereo PAK which has a line in to join the PSG with its output).
This is mostly intended.
As you develop hardware, and cloned PSG is already available in MFRSCC+SD (dunno about Gr8net) eventually PSG can be mixed to MSX-Music.
It might be nice to have this PSG/MSX-Music mix coming out of a cartridge's audio output because there are quite some Japanese games which support both at the same time.

Por msd

Paragon (1532)

imagem de msd

04-06-2017, 08:15

I wouldn't call this pseudo stereo, it is stereo (although with limitations ) . There are also pseudo stereo solutions which add a delay between left and right channel. Or you could even add a chores effect to make it 'stereo'

Por hit9918

Prophet (2932)

imagem de hit9918

04-06-2017, 08:36

I think it is not about making a PSG but gr8tnet gets an OPL.
I think the question is, there are two sound cartridges, what are their sound connectors.
I hope the OPL interrupts work same in gr8net. For programs for off the shelf hardware. I need IM2. I got 257 bytes table for noisy databuses.
"The MoonSound comes with a cable (mini jack to 2 × cinch; stereo) to connect it to an amplifier"
a stereo mic out connector?
"Mono sound output"

maybe the PSG slot pin is not used?


Enlighted (6092)

imagem de NYYRIKKI

04-06-2017, 09:06

The "MSX pseudo-stereo" is an invention from Netherlands... MSX-MUSIC there had quite some variation... It could be build in model, FM-PAC or some local clone such as FM stereo PAK or similar. Although some people modified their cartridges or they did have direct sound output already in place it was not very common.

With MSX-AUDIO the situation was much more simple... Over there practically only known MSX-AUDIO was Philips MUSIC-MODULE that had a separate RCA output for sound already from factory. Some people even improved the stereo separation by cutting the foil going to pin 49 from inside the cartridge.

Practically this means that PSG was mixed together with MSX-MUSIC and MSX-AUDIO had a separate channel.
Software from these days helps... see ie. here how it was meant to be connected:

Por Eugeny_Brychkov

Paragon (1232)

imagem de Eugeny_Brychkov

04-06-2017, 11:15

Meits wrote:

PSG drum hasn't been used that much as they sound like dry farts

Smile Smile Smile

As you know current version of GR8NET is mono and both OPLL and OPL are talking onto the same channel, going to MSX output.

I am thinking to make stereo out, but can not decide how should I wire things so that existing software work properly as intended. I want to make it correctly from the very start, and that's why I ask you. I want to avoid resoldering in the field (e.g. rewiring channels), and avoid using any switching equipment (either switches or analog multiplexers).

Imagine the following setup:

  • DAC has two audio outputs, "left" and "right";
  • Each output is being separated into two streams -
      [1] into 2.5 mm phone/line out jack, and
      [2] into MSX slot pin 49 (going to MSX internal mixer), where are being mixed with machine's PSG

First issue, should I have both channels to go to pin 49? Or only one must be mixed with machine's internal PSG. According to @Meits and @NYYRIKKI I should put OPLL through, let's say, "left" channel to be fed into machine, while "right" channel is fully dedicated for the jack output only. Thus only one channel will be routed to the MSX slot pin 49.

However there're other setups possible:

  • I can put PSG into the GR8NET (if space permits) to mix with the channel of your software choice, do not output any of GR8NET audio into the MSX slot connector; But it is a big question if it is worth in terms of software support and quality of sound; PSG will still sound like "dry farts", and audio generated will not be heard through MSX speaker;
  • route both channels into MSX slot, thus it will be mess through MSX speaker, but with PSG, however OPL and OPLL will be clean through the jack's dedicated channel.

Por Algorythms

Champion (288)

imagem de Algorythms

04-06-2017, 11:35

I would add a stereo output connector to the cartridge, eliminating problems with the different internal circuits in different machines. I'd also add psg from the cart connector, and a mixer circuit. I once made a mixer with an IC that had resistors that were digitally controlled in 128 steps. Using half of them for volume and half for panning.

Por Grauw

Ascended (10821)

imagem de Grauw

04-06-2017, 11:49

There were three variations of MSX-Music produced in the Netherlands:

1. Mono (most common), often no cartridge jack
2. Pseudo-stereo with a small delay on the other channel of the cartridge jack to get a "stereo chorus" effect
3. Stereo (FM-Stereo-Pak) which outputs the FM channels on the left and the FM-drums on the right of the cartridge jack output (the YM2413 has separate outputs for them)

I’ve never heard the 2nd variation, but I have the 3rd and I’m not a big fan of that effect Smile. However for mixing / post-processing the music it might be nice. Btw, I’m not sure any of them outputs PSG on the cartridge jack?

The MoonBlaster 1.4 stereo is as Meits describes it, but I’m not sure if the MSX-Audio or the MSX-Music is supposed to go on the left channel. Both output in mono to the MSX, of course.

And MB 1.4 PSG drums support, I didn’t even know about that! Big smile Kinda neat though, too bad it wasn’t used so much and didn’t include PSG tone channel support, because I love love Micro Cabin-style music Smile. Trilo Tracker FM also supports this OPLL+PSG combination. But I don’t know if it was ever seriously used in a stereo configuration.

What sounds like maybe a good setup is, output both FM chips to the MSX in mono, output them to the jack in stereo, and output a GR8NET PSG to the jack on both channels. Make the FM chips mono/stereo a settting, maybe, so they can also both output to the jack in mono (for non-stereo applications).

Por alexito

Paladin (761)

imagem de alexito

04-06-2017, 11:52

Completely agree with @algorythms
Internal PSG from some msx computers have bad mixers hardware inside. So your device would be very useful if you can mimics how the extra PSG on mfrscc+ would be great so the software already exist can run.

Por msd

Paragon (1532)

imagem de msd

04-06-2017, 12:14

Mb 1.4 its psg support was really bad.
@grauw: that fm'stereo' pack was a really bad idea.

Por meits

Scribe (6571)

imagem de meits

04-06-2017, 12:26

Grauw wrote:

2. Pseudo-stereo with a small delay on the other channel of the cartridge jack to get a "stereo chorus" effect

I’ve never heard the 2nd variation

I never even heard of it. Which one was it? i do know about external pseudo stereo solutions which were available back then.

Página 1/3
| 2 | 3